The Italian government’s reinstated practice of transferring certain migrants and asylum seekers to Albania represents a complex interplay of migration management policies, international agreements, and the socio-political climates of both nations. This practice often involves individuals who have arrived in Italy, primarily via maritime routes, and whose asylum claims may be deemed inadmissible or who are considered eligible for return under bilateral agreements. The specific criteria used for selection and the conditions under which these transfers occur are subject to ongoing scrutiny and debate by humanitarian organizations and legal experts.
The historical context for this policy includes existing repatriation agreements between Italy and Albania, as well as broader European Union policies aimed at managing migration flows. Proponents argue that such transfers can help alleviate pressure on Italy’s asylum system and deter irregular migration. Critics, however, express concerns about the human rights implications for those transferred, questioning whether Albania has the capacity to provide adequate reception and integration support, and whether due process is consistently followed. The policy’s effectiveness in achieving its stated goals, its long-term impact on the relationship between Italy and Albania, and its broader implications for European migration policy remain key areas of analysis and discussion.
