The duration of a journey by air between New York City and Amsterdam typically ranges from seven to eight hours for non-stop flights. Several factors can influence the actual time in the air, including wind conditions, air traffic control, and the specific route taken. Connecting flights, involving a layover in another city, will naturally extend the overall travel time significantly, sometimes by several hours depending on the connection’s length.
Accurate flight time estimations are crucial for travelers planning trips between these two major cities. This information is essential for booking connecting flights, arranging ground transportation, scheduling activities upon arrival, and managing overall travel logistics. Historically, determining transatlantic flight times was a more complex process, but advancements in aviation technology and weather forecasting have made predicting durations far more precise. Understanding typical flight durations allows travelers to manage expectations and plan accordingly, minimizing potential disruptions and maximizing their time.
This understanding of the typical flight duration forms the basis for exploring related topics, such as the best airlines for this route, the most convenient airports in both cities, and tips for managing long-haul flights. Further exploration can also delve into the historical development of this air route and its impact on cultural and economic exchange between the United States and the Netherlands.
1. Non-stop flight
The core of any inquiry regarding flight duration between New York City and Amsterdam hinges upon the typical timeframe of a non-stop flight, established as approximately seven to eight hours. This baseline serves as the foundation for all further planning and expectation management related to such journeys. A direct flight eliminates the added time associated with layovers, transfers, and potential delays inherent in connecting flights. Therefore, understanding this fundamental duration provides travelers with a crucial starting point for estimating total travel time. For instance, a business traveler scheduling a meeting in Amsterdam shortly after arrival would rely heavily on the predictability offered by this seven-to-eight-hour window. This predictable timeframe enables informed decisions regarding departure times from New York and subsequent scheduling in Amsterdam.
Further illustrating its significance, consider scenarios involving tight connections or time-sensitive commitments. A passenger booking a separate connecting flight from Amsterdam to another European destination must account for this initial transatlantic leg to ensure sufficient layover time. Failure to accurately factor in the seven-to-eight-hour flight duration could lead to missed connections and disrupted itineraries. Conversely, understanding this standard duration empowers travelers to select flights strategically, minimizing overall travel time and maximizing time spent at their destination. This is particularly relevant for leisure travelers aiming to maximize vacation time or individuals with constrained schedules.
In summary, accurate knowledge of the standard seven-to-eight-hour non-stop flight duration between New York City and Amsterdam constitutes a critical piece of information for anyone undertaking this journey. It provides a benchmark against which to measure other travel options, facilitates informed decision-making regarding scheduling and connections, and ultimately contributes to a smoother and more efficient travel experience. While unforeseen circumstances such as weather delays can still influence the actual flight time, understanding the standard duration allows for more realistic contingency planning and minimizes the impact of such disruptions. This foundational understanding of the non-stop flight duration is inextricably linked to the broader question of overall travel time between these two cities.
2. Connecting Flights
The overall duration of travel between New York City and Amsterdam increases significantly when connecting flights are involved. While a non-stop flight offers a predictable timeframe, introducing a connecting flight adds a layer of complexity to the journey, directly impacting the total time spent in transit. This extended duration stems from several factors inherent in connecting flights. Layover times, which can range from a few hours to an entire day, contribute substantially to the increased travel time. Furthermore, connecting flights necessitate additional boarding and disembarking procedures, security checks, and potential baggage transfers, each adding to the overall duration.
Consider a scenario where a traveler opts for a connecting flight through a European hub like London or Paris. The layover itself could add anywhere from two to four hours to the total travel time. Additionally, factors such as gate changes, flight delays at the connecting airport, and potential baggage handling issues can further extend the journey. In contrast to a non-stop flights relatively predictable seven-to-eight-hour timeframe, a connecting flight introduces a greater degree of variability and potential for extended travel time. This variability underscores the importance of considering connection times and potential delays when evaluating flight options. For time-sensitive travel, the predictability of a non-stop flight often outweighs the potential cost savings of a connecting flight.
Understanding the impact of connecting flights on overall travel time is crucial for effective trip planning. Travelers must weigh the potential cost savings against the increased travel time and potential for delays when considering connecting flights. For individuals with flexible schedules or those prioritizing cost savings, a connecting flight might be a viable option. However, for those with time constraints or critical appointments, the added time and uncertainty associated with connecting flights often make non-stop options more suitable, even with a potential price premium. Careful consideration of these factors ensures informed decisions aligned with individual travel needs and priorities.
3. Wind conditions
Wind conditions play a significant role in determining the actual flight duration between New York City and Amsterdam. The prevailing jet stream, a high-altitude air current flowing from west to east across the North Atlantic, exerts a considerable influence on transatlantic flights. Flights traveling eastward from New York to Amsterdam benefit from a tailwind, effectively reducing travel time. Conversely, westward flights from Amsterdam to New York face headwinds, increasing flight duration and fuel consumption. The impact of these winds can be substantial, with variations of up to an hour or more depending on the jet stream’s strength and direction. Consequently, seemingly identical routes can experience notable differences in flight times due solely to variations in wind conditions.
The practical significance of understanding wind effects becomes evident when considering flight schedules and potential delays. Airlines factor predicted wind conditions into their flight planning, adjusting scheduled times to account for anticipated headwinds or tailwinds. However, unpredictable shifts in wind patterns can still lead to unexpected delays or earlier-than-scheduled arrivals. For example, an unusually strong headwind could extend a flight from New York to Amsterdam beyond the typical seven-to-eight-hour window, impacting connecting flights and subsequent travel arrangements. Monitoring wind forecasts becomes particularly critical for travelers with tight connections or time-sensitive engagements. Specialized aviation weather reports provide detailed information regarding wind speeds and directions at various altitudes, enabling informed assessments of potential delays or schedule adjustments.
In summary, wind conditions, particularly the influence of the jet stream, constitute a crucial factor affecting the actual flight duration between New York City and Amsterdam. While airlines integrate predicted wind patterns into their scheduling, unpredictable fluctuations can still lead to variations in travel time. Recognizing the impact of these conditions underscores the importance of monitoring weather forecasts and incorporating potential wind-related delays into travel plans. This awareness facilitates proactive adaptation to potential schedule changes and contributes to a smoother, more predictable travel experience.
4. Air Traffic Control
Air traffic control (ATC) plays a critical role in determining the actual duration of a flight between New York City and Amsterdam. While scheduled flight times provide an estimate, ATC interventions, necessitated by airspace congestion, weather conditions, and other operational factors, can introduce variations in flight paths and, consequently, travel times. Understanding ATC’s influence is crucial for anticipating potential deviations from published schedules and managing travel expectations.
-
Holding Patterns:
Aircraft may be placed in holding patterns, circling a designated area at a prescribed altitude, to manage traffic flow and maintain safe separation between aircraft. Such delays, though essential for safety, can extend flight durations, particularly during peak travel periods or periods of inclement weather. A flight from NYC to Amsterdam might experience an extended flight time due to holding patterns over the congested airspace around major European airports.
-
Rerouting:
ATC may reroute flights to avoid areas of turbulence, storms, or other airspace restrictions. These deviations from the most direct route necessarily increase flight distance and, consequently, flight time. If a storm system develops along a flight’s planned trajectory, ATC might redirect the aircraft northward, adding considerable mileage and time to the journey.
-
Ground Delays:
Ground delays, implemented by ATC to manage congestion at arrival airports, can affect departure times. Aircraft held on the ground due to destination airport congestion experience delayed takeoffs, impacting the overall travel time even before the flight commences. A flight from NYC to Amsterdam might experience a delayed departure due to congestion at Schiphol Airport, impacting the arrival time despite normal in-flight conditions.
-
Sequencing and Spacing:
ATC manages the sequencing and spacing of aircraft approaching an airport for landing. This process, while ensuring safe and efficient operations, can introduce delays as aircraft are spaced appropriately for landing. A flight from NYC to Amsterdam might experience a brief holding pattern or reduced speed during its final approach to accommodate the landing sequence at Schiphol, slightly impacting the overall flight duration.
In conclusion, while the scheduled flight time between New York City and Amsterdam provides a baseline, the influence of air traffic control introduces a degree of variability in actual travel time. Understanding the various ways in which ATC can impact flight durations through holding patterns, rerouting, ground delays, and sequencing empowers travelers to anticipate potential deviations and manage expectations accordingly. This awareness facilitates more realistic travel planning and reduces the potential for disruptions caused by unforeseen ATC interventions.
5. Specific Route
The specific route an aircraft takes between New York City and Amsterdam directly influences the overall flight duration. While the great-circle distancethe shortest distance between two points on a sphereremains relatively constant, the actual flight path often deviates due to a variety of factors, impacting the total distance traveled and, consequently, the flight time. Understanding these factors provides valuable context for interpreting variations in flight durations between seemingly similar journeys.
-
Air Traffic Control:
Air traffic control dictates the precise trajectory an aircraft follows. To manage air traffic flow and ensure safety, aircraft are frequently directed along specific corridors or airways, which may not always align with the most direct route. Deviations around congested airspace or weather systems can add significant mileage to a flight, increasing the overall duration. For example, a flight might be directed north of its ideal trajectory to avoid a congested area over the Atlantic, adding extra time to the journey.
-
Wind Conditions:
While the jet stream generally favors eastward flights, its position and strength can vary. To optimize fuel efficiency and minimize travel time, airlines adjust flight paths to take advantage of favorable tailwinds or minimize the impact of headwinds. This dynamic routing, while efficient, can lead to variations in flight paths and durations. A flight encountering an unusually strong jet stream might be routed further north or south to leverage more favorable wind conditions, impacting the overall distance and flight time.
-
Geopolitical Factors:
Airspace closures due to geopolitical events or military exercises can necessitate significant route adjustments. Flights might be rerouted around restricted areas, adding considerable distance and time to the journey. For instance, airspace closures over certain regions might require a flight from NYC to Amsterdam to take a more southerly route, increasing the flight duration.
-
Airline Operational Procedures:
Individual airlines may have preferred routes based on their operational hubs and established flight networks. These preferences can influence route selection, even when minor variations in distance or flight time exist. An airline with a major hub in a particular European city might route its NYC-Amsterdam flights through that hub, adding a slight detour even if a more direct route is technically feasible.
In summary, the specific route flown between New York City and Amsterdam is a dynamic factor influenced by a complex interplay of air traffic control, wind conditions, geopolitical considerations, and airline operational procedures. These factors contribute to variations in flight durations, highlighting the importance of understanding that published flight times are estimates subject to change based on the actual route taken. Recognizing these influences provides a more comprehensive understanding of the factors contributing to the overall travel time between these two cities.
6. Airline Choice
While the typical flight duration between New York City and Amsterdam remains within the seven-to-eight-hour range for non-stop flights, the choice of airline can introduce slight variations in actual travel time. These variations, though often marginal, arise from a combination of factors related to airline-specific operational procedures, aircraft type, and route preferences. Understanding these nuances can be beneficial for travelers seeking to optimize their itineraries and manage expectations regarding total travel time.
-
Aircraft Type:
Different aircraft types possess varying cruising speeds. While the impact on a transatlantic flight might be relatively small, an airline operating a newer, faster aircraft might shave some minutes off the total flight time compared to an airline using an older model. For instance, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner, known for its fuel efficiency and higher cruising speed, might complete the journey slightly faster than an older Airbus A330.
-
Route Preferences:
Airlines often exhibit route preferences based on established flight networks and operational hubs. These preferences, even when resulting in marginally longer routes, can influence overall flight duration. An airline favoring a slightly more northerly or southerly route due to existing traffic flows or operational efficiencies might experience a marginally longer flight time compared to an airline adhering to a more direct great-circle route. This variance, though typically minimal, can nonetheless impact total travel time.
-
Scheduled Flight Times:
Airlines publish scheduled flight times that reflect their operational strategies and anticipated conditions. While adhering to the general seven-to-eight-hour window, airlines might schedule slightly shorter or longer durations based on factors like anticipated wind conditions, air traffic control expectations, and internal operational targets. Comparing scheduled times across different airlines for the same route can reveal these subtle differences.
-
On-Time Performance:
An airline’s historical on-time performance provides insight into its operational efficiency and potential for delays. While external factors beyond an airline’s control, such as weather or air traffic congestion, can impact any flight, an airline with a consistently poor on-time record might be more susceptible to delays, potentially increasing the effective travel time. This factor warrants consideration when comparing airline options, especially for travelers with tight connections or time-sensitive schedules.
In conclusion, while airline choice might not drastically alter the overall flight duration between New York City and Amsterdam, nuanced differences arising from aircraft type, route preferences, scheduled times, and on-time performance can introduce slight variations. Considering these factors, alongside other elements like price and amenities, provides a more comprehensive perspective for travelers seeking to optimize their travel experience and accurately estimate total travel time.
7. Time of year
Seasonal variations, while not drastically altering typical flight durations between New York City and Amsterdam, introduce nuances impacting overall travel time. These seasonal influences primarily manifest through weather patterns and their subsequent effects on flight routes, air traffic control, and potential delays. Understanding these seasonal factors enables travelers to anticipate potential variations and make informed decisions regarding travel planning.
-
Winter Weather:
Winter months often bring inclement weather systems, including snowstorms and strong winds, across the North Atlantic. These conditions can lead to flight delays, diversions, and longer flight times due to rerouting around storm systems. Increased air traffic congestion around major airports during holiday periods can exacerbate these delays, further impacting overall travel time. A flight scheduled for December might experience delays departing from New York City due to snowstorms or encounter longer flight times due to necessary diversions around inclement weather over the Atlantic.
-
Summer Thunderstorms:
Summer thunderstorms, though typically localized and shorter in duration than winter storms, can still disrupt flight schedules. Flights might be delayed or rerouted to avoid thunderstorms along their planned trajectories, adding to overall travel time. Additionally, increased convective activity can create turbulence, potentially impacting flight paths and durations. A July flight might experience a short delay departing from New York City due to thunderstorm activity in the vicinity or encounter minor route adjustments to circumvent areas of turbulence associated with convective weather systems.
-
Jet Stream Variability:
The jet stream, a significant factor influencing transatlantic flight times, exhibits seasonal variations in its position and strength. While generally favoring eastward flights, the jet stream’s position can shift, impacting the extent of tailwind assistance or headwind resistance. These shifts can result in slight variations in flight durations throughout the year. A flight during the spring might experience a slightly longer flight time due to a weaker or less favorably positioned jet stream compared to a similar flight during the fall, when the jet stream typically provides stronger tailwinds for eastward flights.
-
Peak Travel Seasons:
Peak travel seasons, such as summer and holiday periods, often experience increased air traffic volume. This heightened demand can lead to greater congestion at airports and in airspace, resulting in more frequent delays and potentially longer taxi times. These delays, though not directly impacting in-flight duration, contribute to increased overall travel time. A flight during the peak summer travel season might experience longer taxi times both at departure and arrival airports due to increased traffic volume, adding to the total time spent in transit.
In conclusion, seasonal changes introduce variables influencing the overall travel time between New York City and Amsterdam. While the core flight duration remains relatively consistent, the interplay of weather patterns, jet stream variations, and peak travel season congestion introduces nuances that travelers should consider. Understanding these seasonal factors facilitates more realistic planning and expectation management, enabling informed decisions regarding flight selection and itinerary development. By accounting for potential seasonal impacts, travelers can better prepare for potential delays and optimize their travel experiences.
8. Airport
Departure airport choice within the New York City metropolitan areaJohn F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK), Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR), or LaGuardia Airport (LGA)plays a role in the overall travel time to Amsterdam, although not directly impacting the in-flight duration. Factors such as ground transportation time to the airport, airport size and layout, and security processing times contribute to variations in pre-flight travel time, influencing the overall journey duration.
-
Ground Transportation:
Travel time to each airport varies significantly depending on the departure point within New York City and the chosen mode of transport. JFK, located in Queens, might involve a longer commute from Manhattan compared to LGA, situated closer to Midtown. EWR, located in New Jersey, typically requires crossing state lines, adding complexity and potential delays to ground transportation, particularly during peak traffic hours. This ground transportation time contributes significantly to the overall travel experience and should be factored into total journey duration.
-
Airport Size and Layout:
Airport size and layout influence the time required to navigate from check-in to the departure gate. Larger airports like JFK typically involve longer walking distances and potentially more complex terminal transfers, whereas smaller airports like LGA might offer quicker navigation. EWR, despite its size, is known for its relatively efficient layout. These variations in airport navigation time, though not directly affecting flight duration, impact overall travel time.
-
Security Processing:
Security processing times vary among airports depending on passenger volume, staffing levels, and efficiency of security procedures. Peak travel times often experience longer security lines at all three airports. Travelers should monitor real-time security wait times and allocate sufficient buffer time to avoid potential delays, as these contribute to overall journey duration. While TSA PreCheck can expedite this process, variations still exist across airports and throughout the day.
-
Flight Availability and Schedules:
The availability of non-stop flights to Amsterdam and their scheduled departure times vary across the three NYC airports. While all three offer service to Amsterdam, the frequency and timing of flights might differ, influencing departure time convenience and overall travel plans. A traveler departing from LGA might have fewer non-stop flight options compared to JFK, potentially necessitating a connecting flight through another hub, adding significantly to overall journey duration.
In summary, while the choice of departure airport among JFK, EWR, and LGA does not alter the flight time from New York City to Amsterdam itself, it significantly impacts the overall travel time. Factors such as ground transportation, airport navigation, security processing, and flight availability contribute to variations in pre-flight travel experience and influence overall journey duration. Careful consideration of these factors, alongside flight schedules and personal preferences, ensures efficient and informed travel planning.
9. Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (AMS)
Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (AMS) plays a crucial role in the overall travel time when considering flights from New York City (NYC). While not directly influencing the in-flight duration, Schiphol’s operational efficiency, customs and immigration procedures, baggage handling processes, and ground transportation options significantly impact the post-flight experience, contributing to the total time spent traveling.
Schiphol’s efficiency as a major international hub directly affects passenger transit time. A well-designed layout, clear signage, and efficient baggage handling systems minimize connection times for passengers transferring to other destinations. Conversely, any disruptions at Schiphol, such as weather-related delays or technical issues, can create cascading effects, impacting connecting flights and extending overall travel time for passengers originating from NYC. For instance, a delayed arrival at Schiphol due to air traffic congestion can cause passengers to miss connecting flights to other European cities, necessitating rebooking and extending their journeys significantly. Efficient customs and immigration processing at Schiphol minimizes wait times for arriving passengers, enabling quicker access to ground transportation and onward connections. Conversely, lengthy queues at passport control or customs inspections can add considerable time to the overall travel experience, especially during peak arrival periods. Similarly, efficient baggage handling at Schiphol contributes to minimizing wait times at baggage claim, allowing for a smoother transition to ground transportation. Conversely, baggage handling delays can significantly extend the post-flight experience, impacting overall travel time.
Furthermore, the availability and efficiency of ground transportation options from Schiphol to various destinations within Amsterdam and beyond directly impact overall travel time. Efficient train connections, readily available taxis, and well-organized ride-sharing services facilitate swift and convenient onward travel, minimizing the time spent transiting from airport to final destination. Conversely, limited transportation options, traffic congestion, or delays in ground transportation services can extend the final leg of the journey, impacting overall travel time. In summary, while Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (AMS) does not directly influence the duration of the flight itself from NYC, its operational efficiency, processing procedures, and ground transportation infrastructure play a critical role in determining the overall travel time. Considering these factors provides travelers with a more comprehensive understanding of the total time commitment associated with traveling from NYC to Amsterdam, facilitating more realistic planning and expectation management. Understanding Schiphol’s role as a key component in the overall travel experience allows travelers to anticipate potential delays, optimize connections, and minimize transit time, ultimately contributing to a smoother and more efficient journey.
Frequently Asked Questions
This FAQ section addresses common inquiries regarding flight durations between New York City and Amsterdam, providing concise and informative responses.
Question 1: What is the typical flight duration for a non-stop flight between New York City and Amsterdam?
Non-stop flights generally range from seven to eight hours.
Question 2: How do connecting flights impact overall travel time?
Connecting flights add significantly to the overall travel time, depending on the layover duration and connecting airport efficiency. Layovers can range from a few hours to an entire day.
Question 3: How do wind conditions affect flight times on this route?
Prevailing winds, specifically the jet stream, can impact flight times. Eastbound flights typically benefit from tailwinds, potentially reducing travel time, while westbound flights encounter headwinds, increasing duration.
Question 4: What role does air traffic control play in flight duration variability?
Air traffic control can influence flight times through holding patterns, rerouting due to weather or congestion, and ground delays. These factors can add to the overall travel time.
Question 5: Do different airlines flying this route have varying flight times?
Slight variations can occur due to airline-specific factors such as aircraft type, chosen route, and scheduled flight times. While generally within the seven-to-eight-hour range, these factors can influence overall duration.
Question 6: How does the time of year influence travel time considerations?
Seasonal weather patterns, particularly winter storms and summer thunderstorms, can impact flight schedules and potentially lead to delays or rerouting, affecting overall travel time. Peak travel seasons may also experience increased congestion, contributing to delays.
Understanding these factors provides a more comprehensive perspective on travel time variability. While the typical non-stop flight duration serves as a baseline, various elements contribute to potential deviations, necessitating flexible planning and realistic expectations.
For further information, explore resources detailing specific airline schedules, real-time flight tracking data, and aviation weather forecasts.
Tips for Managing NYC to Amsterdam Flights
These tips offer guidance for managing the various aspects of flights between New York City and Amsterdam, contributing to a smoother and more informed travel experience.
Tip 1: Book Non-Stop Flights When Possible: Non-stop flights minimize travel time and reduce the risk of delays associated with connecting flights. While potentially more expensive, the time saved and reduced complexity often outweigh the cost premium, particularly for time-sensitive travel.
Tip 2: Consider Departure Airport Logistics: Factor in ground transportation time, airport size, and security processing times when selecting among JFK, EWR, and LGA. Choosing the most convenient airport based on individual circumstances can significantly impact overall travel time.
Tip 3: Monitor Weather Forecasts: Stay informed about weather conditions both in New York City and Amsterdam, as these can influence flight schedules and lead to potential delays or rerouting. Awareness allows for proactive adjustments to travel plans.
Tip 4: Check Real-Time Flight Status: Utilize online flight tracking tools to monitor flight status for potential delays or gate changes. Real-time information empowers proactive responses to unexpected disruptions, minimizing inconvenience.
Tip 5: Pack Smart for Long-Haul Flights: Pack essential items in carry-on luggage to mitigate the impact of potential checked baggage delays. Comfort items like neck pillows, eye masks, and noise-canceling headphones contribute to a more comfortable in-flight experience.
Tip 6: Account for Jet Lag: The time difference between New York City and Amsterdam requires adjustment. Strategies for minimizing jet lag, such as adjusting sleep schedules in advance and staying hydrated during the flight, enhance post-arrival comfort and productivity.
Tip 7: Research Ground Transportation at Schiphol: Investigate ground transportation options from Schiphol Airport to Amsterdam city center or other destinations. Pre-booking train tickets or arranging airport transfers streamlines post-arrival logistics and minimizes transit time.
Tip 8: Utilize Airport Amenities: Amsterdam Schiphol Airport offers various amenities, including lounges, restaurants, and shops. Familiarizing oneself with available services enhances the travel experience, especially during layovers or delays.
By implementing these tips, travelers can effectively manage the various factors impacting flight durations and overall travel time between New York City and Amsterdam. Proactive planning, informed decision-making, and awareness of potential disruptions contribute to a smoother, more efficient, and ultimately more enjoyable travel experience.
These practical considerations complement the earlier discussions of flight durations and influencing factors, culminating in a comprehensive understanding of travel between these two cities. The following conclusion synthesizes these insights and offers final recommendations.
Conclusion
Flight duration between New York City and Amsterdam, while nominally seven to eight hours for non-stop routes, represents a complex interplay of factors. Wind conditions, air traffic control, specific routing, airline operational procedures, and seasonal variations contribute to deviations from this baseline. Connecting flights introduce additional complexities, extending overall travel time significantly depending on layover duration and connecting airport efficiency. Furthermore, the choice of departure airport within the New York City area (JFK, EWR, or LGA) and the operational dynamics of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (AMS) influence overall travel time, impacting pre- and post-flight logistics. Therefore, accurately estimating total travel time necessitates considering these multifaceted elements.
Effective management of transatlantic travel requires informed decision-making based on a comprehensive understanding of these contributing factors. Proactive planning, including careful selection of flight options, monitoring of weather forecasts and real-time flight status, and strategic utilization of airport amenities, can significantly mitigate potential disruptions and enhance the overall travel experience. Ultimately, informed travelers recognize that published flight times serve as estimates subject to variation. A realistic approach, incorporating potential delays and proactive contingency planning, ensures a smoother, more predictable, and ultimately more successful journey between New York City and Amsterdam.
